House · HR 1770 · 119th Congress

Consumer Safety Technology Act

Summary

This bill tells three federal agencies to study and test new technologies. The Consumer Product Safety Commission must try using AI to spot dangerous products and track injuries. The Commerce Department and the FTC must each write reports on how blockchain and digital tokens affect consumers.

In Favor

Testing AI before full deployment lets agencies find problems early and avoid wasting resources on tools that may not work. This bill builds an evidence base so future rules on product safety and token fraud rely on real data. Careful groundwork is a responsible first step before committing to larger action.

Against

This bill only orders studies and a pilot program with no binding results required. Agencies must spend staff time and money with no guarantee of useful action afterward. Reports can sit unused, and a pilot program alone does not fix unsafe products or token fraud.

Additional Considerations

Purpose & Problem

Is the problem real and worth federal action?

The bill directs three federal agencies to study and test new technologies to protect consumers. It targets gaps in tracking product hazards, fighting fraud, and understanding digital tokens.

Scope & Related Provisions

Does it stay focused, or carry unrelated add-ons?

The bill covers three separate topics: AI at the product safety agency, blockchain research by the Commerce Department, and a token fraud report by the trade agency. Each topic stays within a consumer protection theme.

Who Is Affected

Who benefits, and who bears the cost?

The Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Commerce Department, and the Federal Trade Commission each gain new duties. Retailers, product makers, data scientists, and consumers who buy digital tokens are named as parties the agencies must consider.

Cost & Funding

Is it affordable and responsibly funded?

The bill does not authorize or appropriate a specific dollar amount. Each agency must carry out its assigned work using its existing staff and resources to write reports or run a pilot program.

Risks & Implementation

What could go wrong in practice?

Each agency must finish its work within one year of the bill becoming law. Meeting those deadlines requires agencies to hire or assign qualified staff and coordinate across multiple offices at the same time.

Major Provisions by Title

TITLE I--ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY

This title requires the Consumer Product Safety Commission to create a pilot program within one year to test how artificial intelligence can help with its safety mission. The AI must be used for at least one task, such as tracking injury trends, spotting product hazards, monitoring online sales of recalled items, or flagging unsafe imports. After the program ends, the Commission must report its findings to Congress and post the results publicly online.

TITLE II--BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION

This title requires the Secretary of Commerce, working with the Federal Trade Commission, to study how blockchain technology could be used to protect consumers from fraud and deceptive practices. The study must look at current uses, business trends, public-private partnerships, benefits and risks, and possible changes to federal regulations. Within 18 months of the law passing, the Secretary must send a report of the findings to Congress and post it online.

TITLE III--TOKEN TAXONOMY

This title requires the Federal Trade Commission to produce a report within one year on its actions against fraud and deception involving digital tokens and blockchain assets. The report must cover past enforcement cases, other efforts to protect consumers in the token marketplace, and any recommendations for new laws. The FTC must make this report available to Congress and post it publicly on its website.

For the actual bill text, see congress.gov.

AI-generated · Published 6/5/2026